Zuma lied, but not willingly?

the Public Protector’s Report just found Zuma lied to Parliament, but not “willingly”- what exactly does that mean?

How does the president of a country tell parliament that he paid for his own swimming pool, cattle kraal, and much more, and not know that the government actually paid for it?

Assuming this was true, can a person so out of touch of his own affairs be trusted with the affairs of 50 million people?

If not true, what led the protector to such a conclusion?

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s